"There is perhaps a scientifically valid reason they
call them 'fast food' rather than 'delicious food' or 'healthy food'
franchises?"
Hi!
May happiness and healthy overwhelm your day my friend!
I've been doing some research on
fasting recently. For every proponent I find an equally stanch
opponent. I suppose it depends on simply too many factors to make one's judgment
an easy one. Are you over-weight? Are you experiencing underlying
health issues? Are you under doctor’s supervision? The questions
are practically limitless.
Tiffany and I? We're choosing
to do this for purely health reasons and I subscribe to the belief that any
weight loss is temporary weight loss. I subscribe to the principle that
it's basically a "starvation diet".
"Then why do the cleanses,
Chucky?"
I was reading WebMD.com
yesterday during my lunch hour. They happen to be one of the many
opponents of this cleanse I have stumbled upon. However, I beg to differ
with some of their observations and conclusions.
They take the argument that the
human body is designed to cleanse toxins which we humans consume. They
argue that this is the functionality of the liver, the kidneys, the intestine,
etc.
I somewhat challenge this
point-of-view. Back when humans were cave people, I might agree.
Our ancestors ate wholesome and natural meats, berries, fruits and vegetables.
Take us to the 21st century.
We managed to pollute our waters, our air, and our foods with pesticides,
hormones, steroids, GMO's, etc. We're expected to believe that a body
designed for healthy intake is capable of taking on the added crap we humans
have added onto the plate over the centuries? I think not friend.
That's akin to thinking that we can operate our gasoline engines with 50% added
water isn't it? Psst... Please DO NOT try this, okay?
Hi-dee
hi-dee utilize-knowledge-with-a-hint-of-wisdom-ho my friend.
No comments:
Post a Comment